The enemy - does not deserve the trial in the court of law..
Who would try him? The jury of his peers? Other terrorists?
The enemy deserves a bullet.
The captured enemy can be tried by a military tribunal, and then executed.
Remember Nuremberg after the WWII?

I don't which party...I don't belong to any party...unless it's a birhtday party...:-)
P.S. I hate how they change this smiley (:-))

Whats funny here is that you do not understand:
- What is important and what is not
- Who is the enemy and who is not
- Where the root cause of today's problems is...
Do I need to give a hint?

Constitutional right are applied only to the legal citizens and residents.
Khalid Sheik Mohamed and other terrorists are not!
They are enemy combatants. They declared the war on this country and admit they want to kill all of you!

so if we capture Bin Laden, he would be entitled to the same rights as US citizens? I think it's not us who doesn't know history, it's someone else...was any Nazi captured on the battlefied given trials in US courts?...how are the muslim terrorists different?

Svetlana, let me ask you, how much statistics do you know? How much global warming research have you read, and more importantly understand?
I know you have read blubber on the hacked emails from CRU ( so have I ) as well as the original e-mails.. and this is where the manipulation comment is coming from.
I also don't believe we have a conclusive prove of the human-caused global worming, however it's impossible to deny that there has been significant worming over the last 30 or so years.
I bet if it was reversed, and Sarah Palin was a global warming activist, not Al Gore you would have full support of it :).

That is exactly a point.
He is an admitted enemy and does deserve the civil trial.
He already confessed and deserved to be shot! End of story.
Bringing him to the civil court you elevate him to the level of the citizen and give him an opportunity to spread his propaganda.
And them he will become a hero and a mortar for his cause.
You did not answer about the Nuremberg. What was wrong with that?

Gera, wow.. Constitution does not apply to citizens or non-citizen, Constitution only applies to the rights and responsibilities of the federal government.

What?
Constitution and Constitutional rights apply only to US citizens and legal residents, not terrorists.

however it's impossible to deny that there has been significant worming over the last 30 or so years.
why is it impossible?...when now we are facing with the fact that it's been manipulated all along...
give me an instance where republicans or conservatives intentionally manipulated facts/statistics to get federal fundings?
do you honestly think I just repeat everything that politicians say without fact checking?